The Curio Blog
Curiosity is easy. Memory is rare.
Research explainers, clear essays, and honest notes from building Curio.
Explore by question
Choose the rabbit hole, not just the category.
Each path keeps the surprising result beside the limit that makes it trustworthy.
Search every reviewed note by the finding, the test behind it, and what it does not prove.
Open the evidence map →Curiosity can open a window for memory, but confidence, recall, comprehension, and the urge to return are not the same thing.
Confidence, scores, timing, and prediction What did the signal actually measure?A pause, a click, or a Like can reveal a pattern without revealing the whole person behind it.
Ideas, implementation, and visible proof Did the improvement reach the person using it?A plausible system is not yet a working product. These build notes follow each claim to the layer a reader can actually see or hear.
14 evidence-led notes
Latest writing
- Curiosity
- Psychology
- Building Curio
- AI
- Technology & Society
- Learning
- Attention
- Memory
Waiting for an Answer Helped an Unrelated Face Stick
People remembered faces a little better when they appeared during a high-curiosity wait, even though nobody told them to learn the faces.
PsychologySeeing a False Claim Once Can Lift Its Next Truth Rating
Seeing a false claim can lift its truth rating, even when people correctly answer a question about the fact it contradicts. Exposure changes the rating, not the evidence.
Building CurioCurio Will Compare Two AI Workflow Bundles on Fixed Briefs
Curio will compare two AI workflow bundles on fixed briefs and review rules. The test asks whether splitting idea work from building helps a solo builder.
AIOne Case Study Found More Confidence, Not More Correct Answers
In Stuart Oskamp's small case study, everyone read the same sections in the same order. Confidence rose without a clear gain in correct answers.
Technology & SocietyA Facebook Like for Curly Fries Helped Predict a Reasoning Score
A Facebook Like for Curly Fries helped predict a reasoning score in old data. Instagram uses different signals; the bridge is what patterns can reveal.
Building CurioI Changed Sentences and Pauses. The Voiceover Felt Less Like a List.
I preferred one Curio rewrite, but sentence structure and pause timing changed together. The comparison cannot credit either edit.
Building CurioMy Pinned-Card Check Stopped Before the Phone Screen
My server check sent one Curio card first. The phone then rebuilt and ranked the list, so the visible result still needed a screen test.
Technology & SocietyA High-Stakes Score Can Change the Work It Measures
United States law schools changed admissions work and resource use around a public ranking. The case shows how a score can enter the process it measures.
LearningMore Study Won First; Trying to Remember Without the Passage Won Later
In two short-passage college studies, repeated study produced higher recall after minutes. Trying to remember without the passage led after waits of days.
AttentionClosely Timed Signals and Switched Rules Slow Responses Differently
Signals arriving close together can delay a second response. In separate task-switching tests, changed rules also slowed responses against repeat trials.
MemoryOne Fear Test Lost the Threat. Another Still Found It.
After propranolol and a brief fear reminder, a loud-noise blink response no longer clearly separated threat from safety. People's expected-shock ratings still did.
MemoryUnfinished Tasks Can Pull You Back Without Better Recall
A review found no clear recall edge for unfinished tasks, even though other studies found signs of faster access and a pull to resume.
MemorySeptember 11 Reports Changed While Memories Felt Certain
Later September 11 accounts conflicted with earlier reports, while people still described those memories as vivid and trustworthy.
LearningPeople Reading on Screens Sometimes Misjudged What They Learned
Matched-text reviews found a small average paper edge. Some people reading on screens also estimated their own test results less accurately.